<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom Sharpening &#8211; Which Brush to use?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/</link>
	<description>Online Photoshop Lightroom Tutorials and Tips with Matt Kloskowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Atique</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10359</link>
		<dc:creator>Atique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10359</guid>
		<description>Hi, I can&#039;t find where one can post Q&amp;A question to be answered. Anyway, my question is when I bring the 16Bit image from Lightroom to Photoshop (using Edit with Lightroom Adjustments) and then in Photoshop I convert to 8Bit Mode to apply some filters. When I do a SAVE AS JPEG in Photoshop my end result loses the contrast and the images looks flat, dull and blackish. What is the proper way to do it? Should I bring my images from Lightroom already in 8Bit? How would you do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I can&#8217;t find where one can post Q&amp;A question to be answered. Anyway, my question is when I bring the 16Bit image from Lightroom to Photoshop (using Edit with Lightroom Adjustments) and then in Photoshop I convert to 8Bit Mode to apply some filters. When I do a SAVE AS JPEG in Photoshop my end result loses the contrast and the images looks flat, dull and blackish. What is the proper way to do it? Should I bring my images from Lightroom already in 8Bit? How would you do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amz</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10358</link>
		<dc:creator>amz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10358</guid>
		<description>Selective sharpening is standard practice in portrait retouching - you want the skin &#039;soft&#039; (e.g. negative clarity in LR), but the nostrils, eyes, and mouth crisp...

I agree with Matt in that I like my Intuos4 better in PS (more control), but these days I do about 95% of all my stuff in LR, including the sharpening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selective sharpening is standard practice in portrait retouching &#8211; you want the skin &#8217;soft&#8217; (e.g. negative clarity in LR), but the nostrils, eyes, and mouth crisp&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree with Matt in that I like my Intuos4 better in PS (more control), but these days I do about 95% of all my stuff in LR, including the sharpening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10357</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10357</guid>
		<description>Matt

Great article and very helpful.  Incidentally, are you using PS&#039;s unsharpen mask or a plug-in like Sharpener Pro?

Thanks

Julian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt</p>
<p>Great article and very helpful.  Incidentally, are you using PS&#8217;s unsharpen mask or a plug-in like Sharpener Pro?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Julian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Zito</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Zito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10356</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

I really like your honesty on this!  I know you do a lot of work in LR and use PS also, and I understand why.  You have grown up with PS and knowing how it works for you is cool!  I, on the other hand, have grown up with LR and not PS.  So I use LR for just about everything, except when I need to do something with layers, then I head to PS.  I&#039;m not very good with PS so I stay way from it.  For me it is a time waster.  My comfort zone is in LR because the workflow is logical and easy to understand and use.  PS to me is confusing.  The terms don&#039;t make sense, too many ways to do one simple task.  It&#039;s not for Photographers in my opinion, it made for graphic designers.  I&#039;ll probably get stone for that comment. :-)  I think it&#039;s a matter of comfort.  I do all my sharpening in LR using both the adjustment brush and detail panel.  I like the detail panel because I can hold down the alt key and see a gray scale of what I&#039;m doing.  I love the masking feature, it&#039;s awesome.  I don&#039;t use PS at all for sharpening.  Didn&#039;t mean to get off on a tangent here.

Thanks for letting us know how you really do it, and letting us express our comments!

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>I really like your honesty on this!  I know you do a lot of work in LR and use PS also, and I understand why.  You have grown up with PS and knowing how it works for you is cool!  I, on the other hand, have grown up with LR and not PS.  So I use LR for just about everything, except when I need to do something with layers, then I head to PS.  I&#8217;m not very good with PS so I stay way from it.  For me it is a time waster.  My comfort zone is in LR because the workflow is logical and easy to understand and use.  PS to me is confusing.  The terms don&#8217;t make sense, too many ways to do one simple task.  It&#8217;s not for Photographers in my opinion, it made for graphic designers.  I&#8217;ll probably get stone for that comment. <img src='http://lightroomkillertips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think it&#8217;s a matter of comfort.  I do all my sharpening in LR using both the adjustment brush and detail panel.  I like the detail panel because I can hold down the alt key and see a gray scale of what I&#8217;m doing.  I love the masking feature, it&#8217;s awesome.  I don&#8217;t use PS at all for sharpening.  Didn&#8217;t mean to get off on a tangent here.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting us know how you really do it, and letting us express our comments!</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Buesing</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10355</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Buesing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10355</guid>
		<description>Matt
I use your presets and greatly appreciate your work.  I have a capture sharpening preset that I have begun to use.  The settings are as follows: amount 60, radius 0.7, detail 25, masking 0.  The preset is used early in the LR workfow.   Any other sharpening in LR is the brush in the develop module and print sharpening in the print module.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt<br />
I use your presets and greatly appreciate your work.  I have a capture sharpening preset that I have begun to use.  The settings are as follows: amount 60, radius 0.7, detail 25, masking 0.  The preset is used early in the LR workfow.   Any other sharpening in LR is the brush in the develop module and print sharpening in the print module.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Holler</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10354</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Holler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10354</guid>
		<description>As far as the sharpening as the last step, I thought that I had read that lightroom was cognizant of this and other order related adjustment idiosyncrasies and actually applied the changes in a methodical order on export...thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the sharpening as the last step, I thought that I had read that lightroom was cognizant of this and other order related adjustment idiosyncrasies and actually applied the changes in a methodical order on export&#8230;thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene lowinger</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10353</link>
		<dc:creator>gene lowinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10353</guid>
		<description>Matt: Real World Image Sharpening by Fraser/Schewe is an awesome book on sharpening, and it addresses the Lightroom Sharpening thingy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt: Real World Image Sharpening by Fraser/Schewe is an awesome book on sharpening, and it addresses the Lightroom Sharpening thingy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Kelley</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10352</guid>
		<description>All good to know. Thanks for the detailed answers, Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good to know. Thanks for the detailed answers, Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott DS</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10351</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10351</guid>
		<description>All it means is we photographers have individual preferences in taking and processing our pictures, which is just how it should be.
 After 50 years in photography I never stop finding new things to do.
I&#039;ve learned a lot from mattk, many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All it means is we photographers have individual preferences in taking and processing our pictures, which is just how it should be.<br />
 After 50 years in photography I never stop finding new things to do.<br />
I&#8217;ve learned a lot from mattk, many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/lightroom-sharpening-which-brush-to-use/#comment-10350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1824#comment-10350</guid>
		<description>I am a bit mixed when sharpening, I either add sharpening to the whole image in LR, or I use PS to add sharpening to select areas. I think the issue with LR is that its way to processor demanding and that affects the behavior of the brushes and sliders at times. Another thing I have noticed is color and density. what i see in LR never matches my RGB and color settings in PS. they usually look a bit lighter in LR than in PS. I hope adobe can somehow do what they did with all the other adobe apps that link the color settings globally between say PS and Illustrator. I know its not monitor calibration, what i see is always what i get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit mixed when sharpening, I either add sharpening to the whole image in LR, or I use PS to add sharpening to select areas. I think the issue with LR is that its way to processor demanding and that affects the behavior of the brushes and sliders at times. Another thing I have noticed is color and density. what i see in LR never matches my RGB and color settings in PS. they usually look a bit lighter in LR than in PS. I hope adobe can somehow do what they did with all the other adobe apps that link the color settings globally between say PS and Illustrator. I know its not monitor calibration, what i see is always what i get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
