<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Thoughts on Eye-Fi Wireless SD Cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/</link>
	<description>Online Photoshop Lightroom Tutorials and Tips with Matt Kloskowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron ashley</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-23765</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-23765</guid>
		<description>Not shooting to CF cards is not a disadvantage.  CF cards are old tech.  Camera bodies have an expiration date.  Granted some of the best image capturing cameras still use CF technology but this is purely because the new generation of full frames have not been born.  But... 2012 is going to rock.  I am glad companoes like eye-fi remain progressive instead of wasting their development resources producing devices for anachronistic camera models.

Photographers seem to be so limited in our sight.  I laugh at all the people telling me how thier glass will hold value, yada ya.  Glass is on the way out big time.  The near future in imaging tech will be liquid lenses directly above sensors with 50%+ plus of the image being recreated through computation.  The only value to that glass will be as an antique artifact.

Let go of your CF card... its served you well.  On to new and better things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not shooting to CF cards is not a disadvantage.  CF cards are old tech.  Camera bodies have an expiration date.  Granted some of the best image capturing cameras still use CF technology but this is purely because the new generation of full frames have not been born.  But&#8230; 2012 is going to rock.  I am glad companoes like eye-fi remain progressive instead of wasting their development resources producing devices for anachronistic camera models.</p>
<p>Photographers seem to be so limited in our sight.  I laugh at all the people telling me how thier glass will hold value, yada ya.  Glass is on the way out big time.  The near future in imaging tech will be liquid lenses directly above sensors with 50%+ plus of the image being recreated through computation.  The only value to that glass will be as an antique artifact.</p>
<p>Let go of your CF card&#8230; its served you well.  On to new and better things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Dallara</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-20974</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Dallara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-20974</guid>
		<description>Great Video, I just got the card and you vid sure helped save me some time...Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Video, I just got the card and you vid sure helped save me some time&#8230;Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digid</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-18812</link>
		<dc:creator>Digid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-18812</guid>
		<description>See link below regarding the Wi-Fi 8gb Pro card this also shows and explains why these cards dont work with compact flash work arounds and a little information about using with an Ipad and Shutter Snitch.

A great video and hope this helps membes with in the group.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/user/grimlightimages?feature=mhum&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eye-Fi 8gb Pro Video Here !&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See link below regarding the Wi-Fi 8gb Pro card this also shows and explains why these cards dont work with compact flash work arounds and a little information about using with an Ipad and Shutter Snitch.</p>
<p>A great video and hope this helps membes with in the group.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/grimlightimages?feature=mhum" rel="nofollow">Eye-Fi 8gb Pro Video Here !</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NIKOND2H</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-16482</link>
		<dc:creator>NIKOND2H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-16482</guid>
		<description>i need the name of a cf adapter for a eye fi pro for my nikon d3 please. thank you very much. my email is borjaagudofotografia@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need the name of a cf adapter for a eye fi pro for my nikon d3 please. thank you very much. my email is <a href="mailto:borjaagudofotografia@gmail.com">borjaagudofotografia@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dweeb</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-14062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dweeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-14062</guid>
		<description>Your podcast omits the fact that this product is just not made for the majority of professional level cameras that require CF cards. I&#039;d like to see the GPS feature explained as well. Looks like a very interesting product otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your podcast omits the fact that this product is just not made for the majority of professional level cameras that require CF cards. I&#8217;d like to see the GPS feature explained as well. Looks like a very interesting product otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivankcw</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-12995</link>
		<dc:creator>ivankcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-12995</guid>
		<description>can u tell me the brand name as well as the photo of  it?thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can u tell me the brand name as well as the photo of  it?thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKIP RUNGE</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>SKIP RUNGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used a CF adapter for mine since the day I bought the card, and I&#039;ve never had a minute&#039;s problem with it.  I shoot with a D200; I&#039;ve used it in a D70 also with no problem.  I know about the manufacturer&#039;s caveat, but it seems to work fine for me.

Just my 2 cents and my own limited experience!

/Skip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used a CF adapter for mine since the day I bought the card, and I&#8217;ve never had a minute&#8217;s problem with it.  I shoot with a D200; I&#8217;ve used it in a D70 also with no problem.  I know about the manufacturer&#8217;s caveat, but it seems to work fine for me.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents and my own limited experience!</p>
<p>/Skip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Powell</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>Any reviews/recommendations for a CF version? I also use a D300, and Eyefi asserts that converters corrupt the card, and that I shouldn&#039;t use one! Any CF option would be welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any reviews/recommendations for a CF version? I also use a D300, and Eyefi asserts that converters corrupt the card, and that I shouldn&#8217;t use one! Any CF option would be welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC Johnson</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-9998</link>
		<dc:creator>KC Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-9998</guid>
		<description>I use the PRO version in a CF adapter on my Nikon D3 and it works quite well. Don&#039;t remember exactly where I got the adapter, but it was only about $10. Love the ability in a studio-type setting to shoot, see the results, and not be tethered with a long cord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the PRO version in a CF adapter on my Nikon D3 and it works quite well. Don&#8217;t remember exactly where I got the adapter, but it was only about $10. Love the ability in a studio-type setting to shoot, see the results, and not be tethered with a long cord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Harper</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2009/first-thoughts-on-eye-fi-wireless-sd-cards/#comment-9997</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1693#comment-9997</guid>
		<description>Like many, I&#039;m wondering about the speed of transferring a high quality jpeg from the camera to the laptop.
Reviews I see seem to be very across the board from 45 seconds to several minutes.
How does the speed compare to tethered shooting? Can it really be used for onsite printing at events while a client waits?

Thanks

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many, I&#8217;m wondering about the speed of transferring a high quality jpeg from the camera to the laptop.<br />
Reviews I see seem to be very across the board from 45 seconds to several minutes.<br />
How does the speed compare to tethered shooting? Can it really be used for onsite printing at events while a client waits?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

