<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 2.2 is Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/</link>
	<description>Online Photoshop Lightroom Tutorials and Tips with Matt Kloskowski</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mark hansen</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7193</link>
		<dc:creator>mark hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7193</guid>
		<description>just to add...I also had to back off of LR2.2 to 2.1.  Didn&#039;t notice much improvement in speed.  Stability was degraded, couldn&#039;t go more than a couple of hours without a freeze.  The main item was exporting raws.  Could not get thru more than 100 without a lockup.  Tryed 3 times.

Being a wedding shooter and processing several hundred at a time, this took down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just to add&#8230;I also had to back off of LR2.2 to 2.1.  Didn&#8217;t notice much improvement in speed.  Stability was degraded, couldn&#8217;t go more than a couple of hours without a freeze.  The main item was exporting raws.  Could not get thru more than 100 without a lockup.  Tryed 3 times.</p>
<p>Being a wedding shooter and processing several hundred at a time, this took down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Rose</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7192</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7192</guid>
		<description>Constand cashing... I&#039;m just filling up my memorycards at the moment, instead of downloading the pictures to my comp, as lr works so damn bad :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constand cashing&#8230; I&#8217;m just filling up my memorycards at the moment, instead of downloading the pictures to my comp, as lr works so damn bad <img src='http://lightroomkillertips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no to 2.2</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7191</link>
		<dc:creator>no to 2.2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7191</guid>
		<description>2.2 constantly crashed for minimal speeed gain. I&#039;ll take the stable one anytime. Uninstalled 2.2 and welcomed back 2.1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.2 constantly crashed for minimal speeed gain. I&#8217;ll take the stable one anytime. Uninstalled 2.2 and welcomed back 2.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJM</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7190</link>
		<dc:creator>AJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7190</guid>
		<description>Installed LR2.2 on a XP-2gb ram. LR1 to 2.1 was one of the most stable and productive system I had to date. Now I have constant crashes. Memory use grows from .4 to about 1gb with and very slow in rendering for the second monitor. Is this something to do with the original authors moving to another company?
AJM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed LR2.2 on a XP-2gb ram. LR1 to 2.1 was one of the most stable and productive system I had to date. Now I have constant crashes. Memory use grows from .4 to about 1gb with and very slow in rendering for the second monitor. Is this something to do with the original authors moving to another company?<br />
AJM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armand</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>Armand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>I installed LR 2.2 on my vista 64. I have cs3. In LR I try to edit on Photoshop and when done i hot save. Then PS writes the new file to disk. This is happening with JPEG. Any clues...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed LR 2.2 on my vista 64. I have cs3. In LR I try to edit on Photoshop and when done i hot save. Then PS writes the new file to disk. This is happening with JPEG. Any clues&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7188</guid>
		<description>Very dissapointed to see that adobe have not fixed a bug that drives me mad - which is:
if you export to a 16 bit tiff and then run an action in photoshop to save a folder of files to jpeg any photo you have developed that you used the adjustment brush on will stop the action, you then have to take that photo out of the folder and repeat the action - if their is another such photo in the folder you have to repeat the process again -
this has wasted me so much time
really hope they fix this soon!
Jane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very dissapointed to see that adobe have not fixed a bug that drives me mad &#8211; which is:<br />
if you export to a 16 bit tiff and then run an action in photoshop to save a folder of files to jpeg any photo you have developed that you used the adjustment brush on will stop the action, you then have to take that photo out of the folder and repeat the action &#8211; if their is another such photo in the folder you have to repeat the process again -<br />
this has wasted me so much time<br />
really hope they fix this soon!<br />
Jane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Webb</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>Matt, thanks for everything.  Here&#039;s an FYI - please pass on to Adobe as appropriate.

LR 2.2 Problem

Just updated to LR 2.2 this afternoon and was at first pleased with the brush improvement - until I turned on automask.  LR 2.2 has locked up twice (both times I&#039;ve tried to use it this p.m.)   Required shutting down LR (losing edits) and relaunching.  One other time LR 2.2 crashed and shut down.

I rebooted my PC after the upgrade and restarted again after the first lockup.

It is again locked up with the hourglass and I will again lose my edits which is no big deal in this particular instance but obviously can&#039;t go on doing this.

Platform: Dell XPS 630, XP Pro, Quad processors, 4 GB RAM, nVidia GeForce 8800 GT.

Thanks again,
Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, thanks for everything.  Here&#8217;s an FYI &#8211; please pass on to Adobe as appropriate.</p>
<p>LR 2.2 Problem</p>
<p>Just updated to LR 2.2 this afternoon and was at first pleased with the brush improvement &#8211; until I turned on automask.  LR 2.2 has locked up twice (both times I&#8217;ve tried to use it this p.m.)   Required shutting down LR (losing edits) and relaunching.  One other time LR 2.2 crashed and shut down.</p>
<p>I rebooted my PC after the upgrade and restarted again after the first lockup.</p>
<p>It is again locked up with the hourglass and I will again lose my edits which is no big deal in this particular instance but obviously can&#8217;t go on doing this.</p>
<p>Platform: Dell XPS 630, XP Pro, Quad processors, 4 GB RAM, nVidia GeForce 8800 GT.</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jax</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>jax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>Just installed version 2.2 and al works like a charm! I&#039;m using vista 32bit and have no memory leaks or issues whatsoever. But I can imagine that running Lightroom on a 1 gb vista system may become problematic. Especially the brush is *very* memory hungry, but that&#039;s fine with me as long as the lag is gone. And it is.

Well done Adobe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just installed version 2.2 and al works like a charm! I&#8217;m using vista 32bit and have no memory leaks or issues whatsoever. But I can imagine that running Lightroom on a 1 gb vista system may become problematic. Especially the brush is *very* memory hungry, but that&#8217;s fine with me as long as the lag is gone. And it is.</p>
<p>Well done Adobe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Holmes</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Upgraded yesterday - pretty much straight away hit problems.  Graduated filter is much slower than previously, also in Develop Module I keep getting a message saying &#039;an unknown error occurred&#039; whenever I click on a thumbnail.  Great...another failed upgrade from Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upgraded yesterday &#8211; pretty much straight away hit problems.  Graduated filter is much slower than previously, also in Develop Module I keep getting a message saying &#8216;an unknown error occurred&#8217; whenever I click on a thumbnail.  Great&#8230;another failed upgrade from Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/lightroom-22-is-available/#comment-7184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/?p=1000#comment-7184</guid>
		<description>Installed 2.2 this morning into 2.1 on  Intel Mac with OS x 10.5.5 and have used all day. Importing from 40d,50d, and 5d MarkII and exporting, developing and printing.  Presets work very well!   Be sure you are looking at a raw picture to see presets!  CS 4 upgraded to 5.2 as well.  I think I will wait to install OS X 10.5.6 for a week or so.  I normally do wait 7-10 days before installing major updates-------a hold over from being burnt with Microsoft updates i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed 2.2 this morning into 2.1 on  Intel Mac with OS x 10.5.5 and have used all day. Importing from 40d,50d, and 5d MarkII and exporting, developing and printing.  Presets work very well!   Be sure you are looking at a raw picture to see presets!  CS 4 upgraded to 5.2 as well.  I think I will wait to install OS X 10.5.6 for a week or so.  I normally do wait 7-10 days before installing major updates&#8212;&#8212;-a hold over from being burnt with Microsoft updates i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

